The Sri Lankan Army has taken the Elephant Pass and now controls the land routes leading into the Jaffna Peninsula- and the Tamil Tigers are now left with one operational base on the east coast of the Island in Mullaitivu.
With military defeat looking near, the options are narrowing for the Tamil Tigers. I think the BBC gets it right by concluding that even if military victory is achieved on the battlefield, the demands for a separate Tamil state are unlikely to go away anytime soon. And that means that the Sinhalese have to break the cycle of ethnic outbidding and actually address this situation- a settlement is possible- even a just settlement is possible, but in order to do that, the Sinhalese have to be willing to engage and compromise- and I don't think that the Sinhalese nationalists are going to want to even consider that after this. They're going to think that they're in a better position to dictate terms to the Tamils rather than forge a settlement.
Friday, January 9, 2009
They Don't Like Sanjay
Obama's choice for Surgeon General, Dr. Sanjau Gupta is not being well received, by either Congressman John Conyers or just in general... NY Times Columnist Paul Krugman didn't like Gupta's on-air showdown with Michael Moore of his latest movie 'Sicko' and, even as Dr. Gupta was accusing Moore of inaccuracies on the air- it turns out that CNN were the ones that got it wrong.
But really- what does the Surgeon General do? Howard Dean (also a Doctor) did point out that the position was pretty much informing the public of current health issues and stuff, which is pretty much what Gupta does to begin with. So why not?
But really- what does the Surgeon General do? Howard Dean (also a Doctor) did point out that the position was pretty much informing the public of current health issues and stuff, which is pretty much what Gupta does to begin with. So why not?
Blago To Start Going... Today.
Yep. The Illinois House is voting on Impeachment today- and if the vote passes, as it's expected too, then Blago will be #8 on the list of Governors who have been impeached in the United States. (Only 8 though? That's kind of surprising...) So, at the very least, even if he does go to jail- he can comfort himself that he did make history.
Just not the good kind.
Just not the good kind.
What Kind of Cig?
So there was fire up in Farmington, MN which caused up to $1 million in damage at the American Legion up there. Investigators have concluded that the fire was caused by a man who was too much of weather weiney to go outside and huddle up with the rest of the smokers (rapidly become a fine tradition in the brutal arctic winters of Minnesota).
Now, here's the question I have: Minnesota (along with other states) have required the manufacture of supposedly 'fire safe' cigarettes that go out very easily- thus preventing the apparently many, many fires that are caused by abandoned lit cigarettes. (Interestingly enough, these supposedly 'fire safe' cigarettes require you to inhale a lot more just to keep 'em lit. Thus exposing you to more nicotine, I'd imagine...)
But anyway- so a $1 million fire was caused by a cigarette dropped into an air duct. So... what kind of cig was it? The supposedly fire safe kind? Or just a regular cancer stick?
Now, here's the question I have: Minnesota (along with other states) have required the manufacture of supposedly 'fire safe' cigarettes that go out very easily- thus preventing the apparently many, many fires that are caused by abandoned lit cigarettes. (Interestingly enough, these supposedly 'fire safe' cigarettes require you to inhale a lot more just to keep 'em lit. Thus exposing you to more nicotine, I'd imagine...)
But anyway- so a $1 million fire was caused by a cigarette dropped into an air duct. So... what kind of cig was it? The supposedly fire safe kind? Or just a regular cancer stick?
Bruno
Prepare yourselves- Bruno is coming and if this article is any indication, Sacha Baron Cohen is pulling out all the stops and might just top Borat.
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Crucifixes are Scaaaaaaary!
A church in England has removed it's crucifix after the Vicar decided that it 'was scaring young children' and it's depiction of pain and suffering was 'putting people off.' If you go check out the article, then you'll find that as crucifixes go, it's a pretty hardcore one- but still, theologically, I'm a little nauseous about this one.
OK, I get it: people want to think about the Redemption of our sins and the fact that not only did Christ die for us, but he rose for us as well- that's fine. It's shiny, happy and we can all feel good about it. But it's not the whole picture. Part of the reason- other than it's stone age Catholic theology- that I objected to 'The Passion of the Christ' was that the picture that was painted was incomplete: Christ died for us, it seemed to say- feel bad, feel very, very bad. There was little or no context provided for the why- why would someone go through all that? What would posses them? What would their motivations be?
It's the same thing with this- even as with just the suffering of Christ, the picture is incomplete, with just the risen Christ, we forget the sacrifice that was made (theologically speaking) on our behalf. And more important, we risk forgetting that the crucifix and the suffering it depicts is not just a portrayal of an off-putting amount of suffering, but rather of supreme act of love. And the fact that, in the eyes of Christians, a complete stranger whom none of us knew personally went through all that for us, is indeed something that would probably put a lot of people off. We're just not comfortable with the idea- but that's what makes it important.
OK, I get it: people want to think about the Redemption of our sins and the fact that not only did Christ die for us, but he rose for us as well- that's fine. It's shiny, happy and we can all feel good about it. But it's not the whole picture. Part of the reason- other than it's stone age Catholic theology- that I objected to 'The Passion of the Christ' was that the picture that was painted was incomplete: Christ died for us, it seemed to say- feel bad, feel very, very bad. There was little or no context provided for the why- why would someone go through all that? What would posses them? What would their motivations be?
It's the same thing with this- even as with just the suffering of Christ, the picture is incomplete, with just the risen Christ, we forget the sacrifice that was made (theologically speaking) on our behalf. And more important, we risk forgetting that the crucifix and the suffering it depicts is not just a portrayal of an off-putting amount of suffering, but rather of supreme act of love. And the fact that, in the eyes of Christians, a complete stranger whom none of us knew personally went through all that for us, is indeed something that would probably put a lot of people off. We're just not comfortable with the idea- but that's what makes it important.
Now Porn?
OK, so if airlines get a bailout, banks get a bailout and the car companies, then why not the porn industry? Well, get this: crusty old pervert (and not in an endearing, Hugh Hefner kind of way) Larry Flynt and exploitative douchebag and Girls Gone Wild CEO Joe Francis are asking Congress for just that.
A bailout.
For the adult entertainment industry.
Flynt said this:
Um, well, good look with that, fellas- that's all I can say. Congress (wisely for once) has yet to respond to their request. I would just ignore it- if you don't care about porn all that much, then who cares? If, however, porn is something you find objectionable (good for you) then take heart- the adult entertainment industry isn't reeling from the economic downturn- it's the awesome power of the internet- and more precisely, the awesome power of just one site:
YouPorn.
YouPorn is killing the adult industry, because why pay for porn when you can see it for free- and more to the point, make it yourselves? Yes, the internet has collided with porn and it's revealed to the horny masses that absolutely anyone can be a porn star if they want to be.
Oh, and there's the whole watching loads of porn for free, too. That probably has some mass appeal, I'd guess.
A bailout.
For the adult entertainment industry.
Flynt said this:
"With all this economic misery and people losing all that money, sex is the farthest thing from their mind. It's time for congress to rejuvenate the sexual appetite of America. The only way they can do this is by supporting the adult industry and doing it quickly."
Um, well, good look with that, fellas- that's all I can say. Congress (wisely for once) has yet to respond to their request. I would just ignore it- if you don't care about porn all that much, then who cares? If, however, porn is something you find objectionable (good for you) then take heart- the adult entertainment industry isn't reeling from the economic downturn- it's the awesome power of the internet- and more precisely, the awesome power of just one site:
YouPorn.
YouPorn is killing the adult industry, because why pay for porn when you can see it for free- and more to the point, make it yourselves? Yes, the internet has collided with porn and it's revealed to the horny masses that absolutely anyone can be a porn star if they want to be.
Oh, and there's the whole watching loads of porn for free, too. That probably has some mass appeal, I'd guess.
Real World First
Via Ain't It Cool, The latest edition of the Real World has been cast and the show's first transsexual roomie has been announced. I think that's a good thing- it would be breaking a barrier of sorts, and I'm generally in favor of such things- but really, I think the Real World is long past its expiration date. Back in the day, there was actually an element of the 'real' to it- like actual random people picked to live together in a house- now, it's almost become a parody of itself- which admittedly is a neat trick.
The Real World, I think fell victim to The Hills- semi-scripted reality shows that made superficial people far more important than they actually were in the cultural zeitgeist- now, cast-members of the Real World are all thin, beautiful and conform to an almost laughably predictable ethnic, socio-economic and sexual orientation mix. No fat people allowed. No ugly people allowed... no, well, real people allowed.
That last remark may not be that fair- after all, these telegenic gods and goddesses are people too- but they don't accurately reflect society today. The Real World is NOT that real... people don't have perfect skin, bodies and ripped abs. They just don't... and the show has long since ceased to have any meaningful reflection of reality to me- when you can't see yourself in a show or relate to anyone on that show, then it has become- a bad show.
Go figure.
The Real World, I think fell victim to The Hills- semi-scripted reality shows that made superficial people far more important than they actually were in the cultural zeitgeist- now, cast-members of the Real World are all thin, beautiful and conform to an almost laughably predictable ethnic, socio-economic and sexual orientation mix. No fat people allowed. No ugly people allowed... no, well, real people allowed.
That last remark may not be that fair- after all, these telegenic gods and goddesses are people too- but they don't accurately reflect society today. The Real World is NOT that real... people don't have perfect skin, bodies and ripped abs. They just don't... and the show has long since ceased to have any meaningful reflection of reality to me- when you can't see yourself in a show or relate to anyone on that show, then it has become- a bad show.
Go figure.
Gaza Truce?
There was brief lull in fighting today to allow for humanitarian supplies to get into Gaza (yay!) and Israel has agreed 'in principle' to a truce being pushed by France and Egypt, but fighting has resumed. Sounds like the sticking point is that Israel doesn't want Hamas left in a position where it could re-arm and do this all over again... which seems fairly reasonable to me.
But, there is movement on the diplomatic front. And that can be nothing but a good thing.
But, there is movement on the diplomatic front. And that can be nothing but a good thing.
"Whose House? That Person's House!"
Via Feministing, The Official Language of the House of Representatives is now gender neutral. That may seem like micro-politics run amuck to many people, but I think it's an important step forward, even if it a little one.
So yeah. Kick Ass!
So yeah. Kick Ass!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
